Toby Ovod-Everett


Win32::ASP::Field - an abstract parent class for representing database fields, used by Win32::ASP::DBRecord


  use Win32::ASP::Field;

        %hash = (
                        name => 'RecordID',
                        sec  => 'ro',
                        type => 'int',
                        desc => 'Record ID',

                        name => 'SemiSecureField',
                        sec  => sub {
                                my $self = shift;
                                my($record) = @_;

                                return $record->role eq 'admin' ? 'rw' : 'ro';
                        type => 'varchar',
                        desc => 'Semi Secure Field',

                        name => 'Remarks',
                        sec  => 'rw',
                        type => 'text',



Field objects are very strange Perl objects. Perl is class based, not prototype based. Unfortunately, unless you want to create a separate class for every mildly wierd field in your database, a class based system is sub-optimal for our purposes. To get around this I implemented a "weak" form of a prototype based language.

The major parent is Class::SelfMethods. It provides an AUTOLOAD that implements the desired behavior. In a nutshell, when asked to resolve a method it does the following:

  • First it checks for whether the object has a property with that name. If it does and the property is not a code reference, it returns the value.

  • If the property is a code reference, it evaluates the code reference on the object with the passed parameters. This means that you can define "instance" (not class) methods by placing anonymous subroutines in the instance. These override the class method. If you need to call the equivalent of SUPER::, call _method on the object.

  • If the property does not exist, it attempts to call _method on the object. Thus, calling read on an instance calls the _read method in the class definition if there is no matching property. If the _read method exists, AUTOLOAD will not get called again. On the other hand if it does not exist, rather than call __read, the AUTOLOAD subroutine will return empty-handed. This way, if the desired property is not defined for the object, undef will be the default behavior.

It is important to understand the above "hierarchy of behavior" if you are to make full use of the customizability of Field objects. In a nutshell, when creating new proper classes all methods should be defined with a leading underscore, but called without the leading underscore, so that they can be over-ridden as needed. One should never directly access the hash $self, but always let AUTOLOAD access it by calling the method with that name. That way instance variables can be implemented as subroutines if need be. It also makes it easy to provide "default" behavior by implementing a method. The only time a method should be called with a leading underscore is when an instance-defined method needs to call the method it is over-riding.


Except for new, which is discussed here, the majority of these are farther down under "INTERNALS".


The new method for Win32::ASP::Field is rather strange. It returns two values - the name along with the Win32::ASP::Field object. This makes it much easier to create hashes of Win32::ASP::Field objects. The parameters passed to the new method should be the desired properties for the new object.

One oddity is that the type property will be used to autoload Win32::ASP::Field::type and the returned object will be of that class. This makes it possible to create arbitrary Win32::ASP::Field objects without an explicit list of use statements at the top.

For an example of how to use new, see the "SYNOPSIS" at the top of the POD.

For a discussion of how new treats passed parameters that have a name that starts with an underscore, see Meta properties.




This is the name of the field. Unlike the other properties, it is not passed the $record in question.


This specified whether the field is read-write ('rw') or read-only ('ro'). Note, you can implement this as a subroutine and it gets passed $record. If it is not implemented or returns a value not equal to one of the above, it is presumed that the value is not accessible. Note that $record may not be fully formed when seq is called in _read. You may wish to return 'ro' if in doubt.



If this returns true than the field is required to be filled out when writing.


This is the friendly description for the object. This gets used for column headings in tables. If not specified, it defaults to name.


This is the text that displays in the browser status area when the mouse is placed over the edit area in edit mode


This is used for TEXT and TEXTAREA form fields to define their width.


This is used to specify the maximum length of a varchar field.


This is used to specify the number of rows for a TEXTAREA form field.


This is used to deal with situations where a field in a child record has the same name as a field in a parent record. This would, of course, complicate the resultant HTML form. To deal with this situation, specify formname. If not specified, the default method will return name.


This is used to indicate the actual SQL field used for recording. It is frequently used in conjunction with as_write. It can sometimes be very handy to use a subroutine for writename. As a subroutine, it gets passed $value. If it needs the whole record to make its decision, you will need to intercept the as_write_pair method.

Say, for instance, that you have a logging record with a SmallValue field that is a 50 character varchar and a LargeValue field that is a text field. The idea is that for short strings you won't incur much cost from the LargeValue field because uninitialized text fields don't create a 2K page. If the string is longer, however, you want to write to the LargeValue field. If the percentage of short strings is 50%, the solution would save ~49.7% on space requirements. The penalty of the unused varchar for the long strings is small contrasted with the savings by not using the text field on the short ones.

In that situation, one might implement writename like this:

        writename => sub {
                my $self = shift;
    my($value) = @_;

    return length($value) > 50 ? 'LargeValue' : 'SmallValue';

The discussion of read includes an appropriate instance level method to round out this demonstration. No implementation of as_write is required because the formatting for varchar and text fields is the same.


This should return an anonymous array of options that will be provided to the user when editing the field. Its presence indicates to as_html_edit_rw the intention to use as_html_options.


Meta properties are a funky way of executing additional code at the time of object creation. The new method accepts a parameter list and returns two values - the name of the field and the field object itself. The advantage of this is that it makes creating a hash of field object much easier. On the other hand, it requires some excessively fancy notation to make method calls on the newly created object while in the hash specifier. However, there's any easy way to indicate when you want a parameter to be a method call. Since parameters don't start with underscores and all actual implementations in class code do, it makes sense to start meta properties with an underscore. The new method simply scans the list of parameters for those that start with an underscore and strips them out of the parameter hash for later use. The value of the parameter should be an anonymous array of parameters to the method.

Typical use of meta properties is to provide code for creating commonly used instance methods.


This meta property sets up writename, as_write, and option_list for use with a fairly standard option list that uses a "hidden" code field and a lookup table that has friendly descriptions. Example usage might look like so:

        _standard_option_list => [
                class     => 'MyDatabase::MyRecord',
                writename => 'LookupCode',
                table     => 'LookupCodes',
                field     => 'LookupCode',
                desc      => 'Description'

Note that although the method is expecting a hash of properties, the parameter list is stored in an anonymous array when passed in during the new method.

Of note, the as_write and option_list methods are implemented to help minimize SQL traffic. The first call to the option_list method will result in setting $self->{option_list} to a reference to the anonymous array before returning that array. Further calls will automatically return that array based on the behavior of the AUTOLOAD method in Class::SelfMethods. See the entry for group for a discussion of the behavior for as_write.


This specifies the Win32::ASP::DBRecord subclass to which this field belongs. This will be used later to access the _FIELDS hash and the _DB object.


This specifies the field within the record object that will be written.


This specifies the name of the table that contains the list of codes and the friendly descriptions.


This specifies the name of the field within that table that contains the code. Frequently, but not always, this will be the same as writename.


This specifies the name of the description field in the lookup table.


This specifies whether there are likely to be multiple calls to as_write. If not present or set to a false value, as_write will only lookup the passed value. If set to a true value, the first call to as_write will lookup all the codes and store them in a hash for further reference. This will reduce SQL traffic in situations where an Win32::ASP::DBRecord object is used within a Win32::ASP::DBRecordGroup for editing records. Unfortunately, the code isn't smart enough to know whether it is being used in a group or on its own, so you have to hard code it. On the other hand, if you need that level of flexibility, you can roll your own methods.


This is where internal methods are discussed with an eye towards over-riding them if need be.


These are quick little methods to provided standardized ways of checking certain boolean "properties"


The can_view method is used to determine if someone has view privileges on a given field. The default implementation, _can_view, tests $self->sec($record) for equivalence with 'ro' or 'rw'.

Implementations can expect the $record as a parameter and should return 1 or 0 as appropriate.


The can_edit method is used to determine if someone has edit privileges on a given field. The default implementation, _can_edit, tests $self->sec($record) for equivalence with 'rw'.

Implementations can expect the $record as a parameter and should return 1 or 0 as appropriate.


The is_option_list method is used to determine if a field should be displayed using an option list. The default implementation, _is_option_list, tests for the existence of $self->{option_list}. This is technically verboten, but it's a performance improvement over returning the full option_list in order to test for it. If you implement a subclass that implements option_list, you should also implement _is_option_list.

Implementations can expect $record and $data as a parameter and should return 1 or 0 as appropriate.


These methods are used to load a record with a given field.


The read method is used to read a specific field out of $results into $record. The default implementation, _read, first calls $self->can_view and then retrieves the appropriate value (if present) from the results set and places it in $record->{orig} as appropriate.

In addition to the parameters $record, the Win32::ASP::DBRecord that will receive the data, and $results, the ADO Recordset object containing the data, the read method is passed the parameter $columns. If $columns contains a reference to a hash and <$self-&gt;name> doesn't return a true value, the data should not be read. This improves performance when the Win32::ASP::DBRecord object is part of a Win32::ASP::DBRecordGroup that is being used to retrieve data from a query where only some of the fields will be displayed.

The properly written read for the writename function displayed long ago would be:

        read => sub {
                my $self = shift;
    my($record, $results, $columns) = @_;

                my $name = $self->name;
    ref($columns) and !$columns->{$name} and return;
    $self->can_view($record) or return;

                $record->{orig}->{$name} = undef;
    $results->Fields->Item('SmallValue') and $record->{orig}->{$name} = $results->Fields->Item('SmallValue')->Value;
                if ($record->{orig}->{$name} eq '') {
      $results->Fields->Item('LargeValue') and $record->{orig}->{$name} = $results->Fields->Item('LargeValue')->Value;

The post method is used to read a specific field into $results from the POST data. It also takes $row as a parameter. If $row is defined, it presumes that it is dealing with a DBRecord that is a member of a DBRecordGroup and should retrieve the appropriately indexed value from the multi-valued POST data. If it is not defined, it presumes that it is dealing with single-valued POST data.

It assigns the value into $record->{edit} as appropriate. It also tests for whether the POST data contains any non-whitespace characters and assigns undef if it does not.

HTML Formatters

These methods are used to format a given value as HTML.


The as_html method is the accepted external interface for displaying a field in HTML. It takes three parameters, $record, $data, and $viewtype, and returns the appropriate HTML.

The default implementation, _as_html, first checks for whether the $record is viewable. If it is not, it simply returns. It then checks to see if $viewtype is 'edit'. If it is, it calls $self->can_edit($record) to determine if the field is editable. If it is, it calls as_html_edit_rw or as_html_options based on is_option_list. If it isn't editable but $viewtype is 'edit', it calls as_html_edit_ro. Finally, if we aren't in 'edit' mode, it calls as_html_view.


The as_html_view method takes two parameters, $record and $data, and returns the appropriate HTML.

The default implementation, _as_html_view, first extracts $value from $record using $data and $self->name. If it is defined, it returns it, otherwise it returns '&nbsp;'. It runs the string through HTMLEncode to enable it to pass HTML meta-characters.

This is over-ridden in Win32::ASP::Field::bit to return 'Yes' or 'No' and in Win32::ASP::Field::timestamp to return nothing (timestamp is not the same as datetime).


The as_html_edit_ro method takes two parameters, $record and $data, and returns the appropriate HTML.

The default implementation, _as_html_edit_ro, first extracts $value from $record using $data and $self->name. It concatenates a HIDDEN INPUT field with the results of $self->as_html_view($record, $data).

This method is over-riden in Win32::ASP::Field::timestamp to encode $value as hex (since timestamp values are binary and thus not healthy HTML).


The as_html_edit_rw method takes two parameters, $record and $data, and returns the appropriate HTML.

The default implementation, _as_html_edit_rw, first extracts $value from $record using $data and $self->name. It then creates an appropriate TEXT INPUT field. Note the call to $self-as_html_mouseover>, which returns the appropriate parameters to implement the help support.

The method is over-ridden by Win32::ASP::Field::bit to display a Yes/No radio pair and by Win32::ASP::Field::text to display a TEXTAREA.


The as_html_options method takes two parameters, $record and $data, and returns the appropriate HTML.

The default implementation, _as_html_options, first extracts $value from $record using $data and $self->name. It then loops over the values returned from $self->option_list and creates a SELECT structure with the appropriate OPTION entries. It specified SELECTED for the appropriate one based on $value.


The as_html_mouseover method takes two parameters, $record and $data, and returns the appropriate string with onMouseOver and onMouseOut method for inclusion into HTML.

The default implementation, _as_html_mouseover, ignores the passed parameters and builds JavaScript for setting window.status to $self->help.

SQL Formatters

Values need to be formatted as legal SQL for the purposes of being included in query strings.


The check_value method is responsible for field level checking of $value. Note that this code does not have access to the entire record, and so record-based checking should be left to the check_value_write method discussed later. If the check fails, check_value should throw an error. Ideally, the error will either be of class Win32::ASP::Error::Field::bad_value or a subclass thereof. There should be no checking for "requiredness" at this level (simply because in many situations it wouldn't be called and so putting it here lends false hope). The default implementation in Win32::ASP::Field does no checking what-so-ever and is merely provided as a prototype.

The method is over-ridden by Win32::ASP::Field::bit to verify that the value is a 0 or 1 (bit fields never allow NULLs), by Win32::ASP::Field::datetime to use Win32::ASP::Field::_clean_datetime which use OLE to verify a datetime value, by Win32::ASP::Field::int to verify that the value is an integer, and by Win32::ASP::Field::varchar to verify that it doesn't exceed the maximum length.


The as_sql method is responsible for formatting of $value for inclusion in SQL. Since this code will be called during the query phase, it doesn't have access to an entire record. The default implementation in Win32::ASP::Field does nothing at all and is merely provided as a prototype.

The method is, therefore, implemented by almost every subclass of Win32::ASP::Field, with the exception of Win32::ASP::Field::dispmeta and Win32::ASP::Field::timestamp, which are never used to query or write to the database.

Writing Formatters

The writing formatters are responsible for preparing the output for updating or inserting records. Some of these have access to the full $record object, and others only have access to the $value. In order to decentralize management of the constraint checking, it would be useful if some $record object checking could be pushed out to the field objects. At the same time, there are situations where a fully formed $record object is not available for field level checking. As a result, there is a profusion of the various formatters and checkers. Rather than discussing them in a top-down fashion, I will start from the bottom as things may make more sense that way.


The as_write method gets passed $value and returns the value that will be paired with writename for writing to the database. Note that it does not get passed the full record - otherwise it would be difficult to call as_write from an overridden as_write.

For example, to implement as_write for looking up a value in a database (obviously just for demonstration purposes - normally you would use _standard_option_list), one might use:

  as_write => sub {
                my $self = shift;
    my($value) = @_;

                my $results = MyDatabase::MyRecord->_DB->exec_sql(<<ENDSQL, error_no_records => 1);
        SELECT LookupCode FROM LookupCodes WHERE Description = '$value'
    return MyDatabase::MyRecord->_FIELDS->{$self->writename($value)}->as_write($results->Fields->('LookupCode')->Value);

That last return line is rather ugly, so let me dissect it:

  • $self->writename returns the fieldname to which the return value will actually get written.

  • MyDatabase::MyRecord->_FIELDS returns the hash of field objects for whatever class is involved.

  • MyDatabase::MyRecord->_FIELDS->{$self->writename} returns the actual field object of interest.

  • as_write is then called on that object with the value returned by looking up the appropriate result in the database.

The main reason for the last line is so that it will properly format the return value using whatever type of field the writename is. This shouldn't be an issue for common fields, but it could be for date/time values in some circumstances.


This is the first of the methods that have access to a full $record. It gets passed both $record and $data and as such can check a given field against other fields in the record. The default implementation calls check_value on the appropriate $value. If the check fails for whatever reason, check_value_write should throw an exception.


The method as_write_pair is the accepted entry point for formatting a value for writing to the database. It accepts $record and $data, so it can call check_value_write to perform record-dependent field validation. It returns a hash composed of two key/value pairs: field should supply the fieldname to write to and value should supply the properly formatted data for inclusion into SQL. Note that if, for some reason, the functionality usually supplied by writename requires knowledge of the entire record, that functionality should be subsumed into as_write_pair.