The Perl Toolchain Summit needs more sponsors. If your company depends on Perl, please support this very important event.

NAME

docs/dev/wranglers.pod - Tips for Bug Wranglers

ABSTRACT

This document attempts to outline a set of "best practices" for dealing with bugs in Parrot's RT system. It is targeted at Parrot developers and "Bug Wranglers" and is not intended as advice or instruction for end users. Bug filing procedures for end users are documented in docs/submissions.pod.

WHAT IS A BUG WRANGLER?

A developer with sufficient permissions to modify the tickets in Parrot's RT system. All Parrot developers are expect to pitch in and help keep the bug tracker in a healthy state. This means you!

WHERE IS IT?

The Parrot bug tracker is currently the same as the Perlbug system used for Perl5 Development. It is available via HTTP at http://rt.perl.org. The Parrot issues are in the queue parrot.

BUG HANDLING PROCEDURES

New Bugs

Where New refers to a pre-existing bug sitting in the Parrot queue with a status of new.

  • Is this spam?

    Assign the issue to the queue spam.

  • Is this a duplication of an existing bug?

    RT doesn't handle that case in a graceful manner. Set the relationship 'dependent on' to the duplicate issue. Add a comment to the bug along the lines of "Duplicate of Bug #123" and change the Tag field to "duplicate".

  • Is there enough information?

    Ask for more input.

  • Is it a [TODO] bug?

    Is the subject line in the format "[TODO] subsystem - issue?

    [TODO] bugs should have their status changed to open to prevent them from appearing in a listing of new bugs.

  • Is it a [PATCH] bug?

    Is the subject line in the format "[PATCH] subsystem - issue?

    Make sure that there is actually a patch attached to the bug...

  • Assign the bug to someone if at all possible.

TODO Bugs

  • Claim ownership or interest ( CC ) of the ticket.

    This way you will receive further correspondence about the ticket.

  • Run the test suite

  • make manitest

  • add the patch author to CREDITS or update the authors entry in CREDITS

  • add correspondence to the bug stating that the patch was applied AND the svn revision number.

  • make sure that the bugs 'Tag' includes 'Patch'

  • set the bugs 'Patch Status' to 'Applied'

  • set the bugs 'Status' to 'resolved'

Old Bugs

If the bug is more then 1 month old then it's considered an old bug.

  • Ping the requestor

    Give the requestor at least 1 week to respond. If no response is received then add a comment to the bug saying that the bug is being close because of no response from the requestor change the status to rejected.

    If it's a [PATCH] bug it's possible that the patch was applied but the bug/patch status was never changed. Also, not all list traffic regarding a bug ends up in RT. It's best to look at the SVN repo to attempt to determine if the bug was resolved.

TIPS FOR CORRESPONDENCE

Don't be a Butthead

Remember that every word you type into the bug tracker is On The Record. Try not to say anything that could offend or hurt the feelings of anyone. That includes the bug submitter and other developers. When, as a Parrot developer with commit rights, you send correspondence you are representing the Parrot project and by proxy TPF. If in doubt, either send the message privately or not at all.

Say thank you!

Try to add a little token of appreciation to every message you send in response to a bug. Bug requestors are doing labor for free! The least you can do is let them know that you appreciate their efforts.

Something like:

    Thanks,

    Thanks for following up.

    Thanks for reporting.

    Thanks for X!

Can work wonders. If you can make someone feel good about themselves maybe they'll submit another bug/patch/whatever or perhaps some day become a Parrot developer.

Don't say "problem"

Supposedly it's better customer relations to use issue(s) instead of the problem(s). Don't ask me why...

Make it clear why the bug status changed

Always note why the bug is having it's status changed. Particularly if it is being closed or rejected. Nothing will irritate people more then letting them think that their bug was unimportant or ignored.

Example Correspondence

    Hi,

    Can you retest for this bug with the latest sources from SVN and confirm
    that this still an open issue?

    Thanks,

    -J

or

    Hi,

    Would you mind retesting with the latest sources from SVN?

    Thanks,

    -J

or

    Hi,

    Can you resubmit this patch different against SVN trunk?

    Thanks,

    -J

or

    Patch applied as rXXX.  Thanks for submitting.

    -J

or

    No response for requestor.  Bug being marked as 'rejected'.
    Thanks for reporting.

    -J

or

    This doesn't appear to be an issue anymore.
    Thanks for submitting

    -J

or

    Marking this bug as 'resolved' because it seems to have fixed itself.
    Thanks for following up.

    -J

AUTHOR

Joshua Hoblitt (JHOBLITT) jhoblitt@cpan.org