# NAME

Math::SigFigs - do math with correct handling of significant figures

# SYNOPSIS

If you only need to use CountSigFigs and FormatSigFigs, use the first form. If you are going to be doing arithmetic, use the second line.

``````  use Math::SigFigs;
use Math::SigFigs qw(:all);``````

The following routines do simple counting/formatting:

``````  \$n=CountSigFigs(\$num);
\$num=FormatSigFigs(\$num,\$n);``````

Use the following routines to do arithmetic operations.

``````  \$num=addSF(\$n1,\$n2);
\$num=subSF(\$n1,\$n2);
\$num=multSF(\$n1,\$n2);
\$num=divSF(\$n1,\$n2);``````

# DESCRIPTION

In many scientific applications, it is useful (and in some cases required) to be able to format numbers with a given number of significant figures, or to do math in such a way as to maintain the correct number of significant figures. The rules for significant figures are too complicated to be handled solely using the sprintf function.

These routines allow you to correctly handle significant figures. It can handle real number or exponentials correctly.

It can count the number of significant figures, format a number to a given number of significant figures, and do basic arithmetic.

# ROUTINES

All routines return nothing if something other than a valid number is passed in for any argument.

CountSigFigs
``  \$n=CountSigFigs(\$N);``

This returns the number of significant figures in a number. It returns `()` if `\$N` is not a number.

``````  \$N      \$n
-----   --
240     2
240.    3
241     3
0240    2
0.03    1
0.030   2
1.2e2   2``````

The number zero is not as well defined as other numbers. I have seen different answers for this. I have seen answers that say that '0' has 0, 1, or infinite significant figures and for '0.00', I have seen the number of significant figures given as 0, 1, 2, and 3. Everyone agrees on how to count signficant figures for non-zero numbers... but that agreement doesn't hold true for zero. At this time, this module will return:

``````  \$N      \$n
-----   --
0       1
0.0     1
0.00    2
0.0e2   1``````

I may try to improve the handling of zero at some point.

FormatSigFigs
``  \$str=FormatSigFigs(\$N,\$n)``

This returns a string containing `\$N` formatted to `\$n` significant figures. This will work for all cases except something like "2400" formatted to 3 significant figures.

``````  \$N     \$n   \$str
------ --   -------
2400    1   2000
2400    2   2400
2400    3   2400
2400    4   2400.
2400    5   2400.0

141     3   141
141     2   140

0.039   1   0.04
0.039   2   0.039
0.0300  2   0.030

9.9     1   10
9.9     2   9.9
9.9     3   9.90

0       2   0.00``````

These routines add/subtract/multiply/divide two numbers while maintaining the proper number of significant figures.

Working with zero is a special case. If 0 has 1 signficiant figure (i.e. '0') it is treated as exact. If it has more significant figures (i.e. 0.00), that number is used as appropriate.

# KNOWN PROBLEMS

Without scientific notation, some numbers are ambiguous

These routines do not work with scientific notation (exponents). As a result, it is impossible to unambiguously format some numbers. For example,

``  \$str = FormatSigFigs("2400",3);``

will by necessity return the string "2400" which does NOT have 3 significant figures. This is not a bug. It is simply a fundamental problem with working with significant figures when not using scientific notation.

The number zero is ambiguous

There is not a universally accepted way to specify the number of significant figures that the number 0 has.

perl cannot preserve significant figures in numbers

If you run:

``````   CountSigFigs(20.00);
=> 1
CountSigFigs("20.00");
=> 4``````

This is simply due to the way that numbers are stored. When using this module, use numbers stored as strings in order to avoid unexpected results.