=head1 NAME
X<reference> X<pointer> X<data structure> X<structure> X<struct>
perlref - Perl references and nested data structures
=head1 NOTE
This is complete documentation about all aspects of references.
For a shorter, tutorial introduction to just the essential features,
see L<perlreftut>.
=head1 DESCRIPTION
Before release 5 of Perl it was difficult to represent complex data
structures, because all references had to be symbolic--and even then
it was difficult to refer to a variable instead of a symbol table entry.
Perl now not only makes it easier to
use
symbolic references to variables,
but also lets you have
"hard"
references to any piece of data or code.
Any
scalar
may hold a hard reference. Because arrays and hashes contain
scalars, you can now easily build arrays of arrays, arrays of hashes,
hashes of arrays, arrays of hashes of functions, and so on.
Hard references are smart--they keep track of reference counts
for
you,
automatically freeing the thing referred to
when
its reference count goes
to zero. (Reference counts
for
values
in self-referential or
cyclic data structures may not go to zero without a little help; see
L</
"Circular References"
>
for
a detailed explanation.)
If that thing happens to be an object, the object is destructed. See
L<perlobj>
for
more about objects. (In a sense, everything in Perl is an
object, but we usually reserve the word
for
references to objects that
have been officially
"blessed"
into a class
package
.)
Symbolic references are names of variables or other objects, just as a
symbolic
link
in a Unix filesystem contains merely the name of a file.
The C<
*glob
> notation is something of a symbolic reference. (Symbolic
references are sometimes called
"soft references"
, but please don't call
them that; references are confusing enough without useless synonyms.)
X<reference, symbolic> X<reference, soft>
X<symbolic reference> X<soft reference>
In contrast, hard references are more like hard links in a Unix file
system
: They are used to access an underlying object without concern
for
what its (other) name is. When the word
"reference"
is used without an
adjective, as in the following paragraph, it is usually talking about a
hard reference.
X<reference, hard> X<hard reference>
References are easy to
use
in Perl. There is just one overriding
principle: in general, Perl does
no
implicit referencing or dereferencing.
When a
scalar
is holding a reference, it always behaves as a simple
scalar
.
It doesn't magically start being an array or hash or subroutine; you have to
tell
it explicitly to
do
so, by dereferencing it.
=head2 Making References
X<reference, creation> X<referencing>
References can be created in several ways.
=head3 Backslash Operator
X<\> X<backslash>
By using the backslash operator on a variable, subroutine, or value.
(This works much like the & (address-of) operator in C.)
This typically creates I<another> reference to a variable, because
there's already a reference to the variable in the symbol table. But
the symbol table reference might go away, and you'll still have the
reference that the backslash returned. Here are some examples:
$scalarref
= \
$foo
;
$arrayref
= \
@ARGV
;
$hashref
= \
%ENV
;
$coderef
= \
&handler
;
$globref
= \
*foo
;
It isn't possible to create a true reference to an IO handle (filehandle
or dirhandle) using the backslash operator. The most you can get is a
reference to a typeglob, which is actually a complete symbol table entry.
But see the explanation of the C<
*foo
{THING}> syntax below. However,
you can still
use
type globs and globrefs as though they were IO handles.
=head3 Square Brackets
X<array, anonymous> X<[> X<[]> X<square bracket>
X<bracket, square> X<arrayref> X<array reference> X<reference, array>
A reference to an anonymous array can be created using square
brackets:
$arrayref
= [1, 2, [
'a'
,
'b'
,
'c'
]];
Here we've created a reference to an anonymous array of three elements
whose final element is itself a reference to another anonymous array of three
elements. (The multidimensional syntax described later can be used to
access this. For example,
after
the above, C<<
$arrayref
->[2][1] >> would have
the value
"b"
.)
Taking a reference to an enumerated list is not the same
as using square brackets--instead it's the same as creating
a list of references!
@list
= (\
$x
, \
@y
, \
%z
);
@list
= \(
$x
,
@y
,
%z
);
As a special case, C<\(
@foo
)> returns a list of references to the contents
of C<
@foo
>, not a reference to C<
@foo
> itself. Likewise
for
C<
%foo
>,
except that the key references are to copies (since the
keys
are just
strings rather than full-fledged scalars).
=head3 Curly Brackets
X<hash, anonymous> X<{> X<{}> X<curly bracket>
X<bracket, curly> X<brace> X<hashref> X<hash reference> X<reference, hash>
A reference to an anonymous hash can be created using curly
brackets:
$hashref
= {
'Adam'
=>
'Eve'
,
'Clyde'
=>
'Bonnie'
,
};
Anonymous hash and array composers like these can be intermixed freely to
produce as complicated a structure as you want. The multidimensional
syntax described below works
for
these too. The
values
above are
literals, but variables and expressions would work just as well, because
assignment operators in Perl (even within
local
() or
my
()) are executable
statements, not compile-
time
declarations.
Because curly brackets (braces) are used
for
several other things
including BLOCKs, you may occasionally have to disambiguate braces at the
beginning of a statement by putting a C<+> or a C<
return
> in front so
that Perl realizes the opening brace isn't starting a BLOCK. The economy and
mnemonic value of using curlies is deemed worth this occasional extra
hassle.
For example,
if
you wanted a function to make a new hash and
return
a
reference to it, you have these options:
sub
hashem { {
@_
} }
sub
hashem { +{
@_
} }
sub
hashem {
return
{
@_
} }
On the other hand,
if
you want the other meaning, you can
do
this:
sub
showem { {
@_
} }
sub
showem { {;
@_
} }
sub
showem { {
return
@_
} }
The leading C<+{> and C<{;> always serve to disambiguate
the expression to mean either the HASH reference, or the BLOCK.
=head3 Anonymous Subroutines
X<subroutine, anonymous> X<subroutine, reference> X<reference, subroutine>
X<scope, lexical> X<closure> X<lexical> X<lexical scope>
A reference to an anonymous subroutine can be created by using
C<
sub
> without a subname:
$coderef
=
sub
{
print
"Boink!\n"
};
Note the semicolon. Except
for
the code
inside not being immediately executed, a C<
sub
{}> is not so much a
declaration as it is an operator, like C<
do
{}> or C<
eval
{}>. (However,
no
matter how many
times
you execute that particular line (
unless
you're in an
C<
eval
(
"..."
)>),
$coderef
will still have a reference to the I<same>
anonymous subroutine.)
Anonymous subroutines act as closures
with
respect to
my
() variables,
that is, variables lexically visible within the current scope. Closure
is a notion out of the Lisp world that says
if
you define an anonymous
function in a particular lexical context, it pretends to run in that
context even
when
it's called outside the context.
In human terms, it's a funny way of passing arguments to a subroutine
when
you define it as well as
when
you call it. It's useful
for
setting up
little bits of code to run later, such as callbacks. You can even
do
object-oriented stuff
with
it, though Perl already provides a different
mechanism to
do
that--see L<perlobj>.
You might also think of closure as a way to
write
a subroutine
template without using
eval
(). Here's a small example of how
closures work:
sub
newprint {
my
$x
=
shift
;
return
sub
{
my
$y
=
shift
;
print
"$x, $y!\n"
; };
}
$h
= newprint(
"Howdy"
);
$g
= newprint(
"Greetings"
);
&$h
(
"world"
);
&$g
(
"earthlings"
);
This prints
Howdy, world!
Greetings, earthlings!
Note particularly that
$x
continues to refer to the value passed
into newprint() I<despite>
"my $x"
having gone out of scope by the
time
the anonymous subroutine runs. That's what a closure is all
about.
This applies only to lexical variables, by the way. Dynamic variables
continue
to work as they have always worked. Closure is not something
that most Perl programmers need trouble themselves about to begin
with
.
=head3 Constructors
X<constructor> X<new>
References are often returned by special subroutines called constructors. Perl
objects are just references to a special type of object that happens to know
which
package
it's associated
with
. Constructors are just special subroutines
that know how to create that association. They
do
so by starting
with
an
ordinary reference, and it remains an ordinary reference even
while
it's also
being an object. Constructors are often named C<new()>. You I<can> call them
indirectly:
$objref
= new Doggie(
Tail
=>
'short'
,
Ears
=>
'long'
);
But that can produce ambiguous syntax in certain cases, so it's often
better to
use
the direct method invocation approach:
$objref
= Doggie->new(
Tail
=>
'short'
,
Ears
=>
'long'
);
$terminal
= Term::Cap->Tgetent( {
OSPEED
=> 9600 });
$main
= MainWindow->new();
$menubar
=
$main
->Frame(
-relief
=>
"raised"
,
-borderwidth
=> 2)
This indirect object syntax is only available
when
L<C<
use
feature
"indirect"
>|feature/The
'indirect'
feature> is in effect,
and that is not the case
when
L<C<
use
v5.36>|perlfunc/
use
VERSION> (or
higher) is requested, it is best to avoid indirect object syntax entirely.
=head3 Autovivification
X<autovivification>
References of the appropriate type can spring into existence
if
you
dereference them in a context that assumes they exist. Because we haven't
talked about dereferencing yet, we can't show you any examples yet.
=head3 Typeglob Slots
X<
*foo
{THING}> X<*>
A reference can be created by using a special syntax, lovingly known as
the
*foo
{THING} syntax.
*foo
{THING} returns a reference to the THING
slot in
*foo
(which is the symbol table entry which holds everything
known as foo).
$scalarref
=
*foo
{SCALAR};
$arrayref
=
*ARGV
{ARRAY};
$hashref
=
*ENV
{HASH};
$coderef
=
*handler
{CODE};
$ioref
=
*STDIN
{IO};
$globref
=
*foo
{GLOB};
$formatref
=
*foo
{FORMAT};
$globname
=
*foo
{NAME};
$pkgname
=
*foo
{PACKAGE};
Most of these are self-explanatory, but C<
*foo
{IO}>
deserves special attention. It returns
the IO handle, used
for
file handles (L<perlfunc/
open
>), sockets
(L<perlfunc/
socket
> and L<perlfunc/
socketpair
>), and directory
handles (L<perlfunc/
opendir
>). For compatibility
with
previous
versions of Perl, C<
*foo
{FILEHANDLE}> is a synonym
for
C<
*foo
{IO}>, though it
is discouraged, to encourage a consistent
use
of one name: IO. On perls
between v5.8 and v5.22, it will issue a deprecation warning, but this
deprecation
has
since been rescinded.
C<
*foo
{THING}> returns
undef
if
that particular THING hasn't been used yet,
except in the case of scalars. C<
*foo
{SCALAR}> returns a reference to an
anonymous
scalar
if
$foo
hasn't been used yet. This might change in a
future release.
C<
*foo
{NAME}> and C<
*foo
{PACKAGE}> are the exception, in that they
return
strings, rather than references. These
return
the
package
and name of the
typeglob itself, rather than one that
has
been assigned to it. So,
after
C<
*foo
=
*Foo::bar
>, C<
*foo
> will become
"*Foo::bar"
when
used as a string,
but C<
*foo
{PACKAGE}> and C<
*foo
{NAME}> will
continue
to produce
"main"
and
"foo"
, respectively.
C<
*foo
{IO}> is an alternative to the C<
*HANDLE
> mechanism
given
in
L<perldata/
"Typeglobs and Filehandles"
>
for
passing filehandles
into or out of subroutines, or storing into larger data structures.
Its disadvantage is that it won't create a new filehandle
for
you.
Its advantage is that you have less risk of clobbering more than
you want to
with
a typeglob assignment. (It still conflates file
and directory handles, though.) However,
if
you assign the incoming
value to a
scalar
instead of a typeglob as we
do
in the examples
below, there's
no
risk of that happening.
splutter(
*STDOUT
);
splutter(
*STDOUT
{IO});
sub
splutter {
my
$fh
=
shift
;
print
$fh
"her um well a hmmm\n"
;
}
$rec
= get_rec(
*STDIN
);
$rec
= get_rec(
*STDIN
{IO});
sub
get_rec {
my
$fh
=
shift
;
return
scalar
<
$fh
>;
}
=head2 Using References
X<reference,
use
> X<dereferencing> X<dereference>
That
's it for creating references. By now you'
re probably dying to
know how to
use
references to get back to your long-lost data. There
are several basic methods.
=head3 Simple Scalar
Anywhere you'd put an identifier (or chain of identifiers) as part
of a variable or subroutine name, you can replace the identifier
with
a simple
scalar
variable containing a reference of the correct type:
$bar
=
$$scalarref
;
push
(
@$arrayref
,
$filename
);
$$arrayref
[0] =
"January"
;
$$hashref
{
"KEY"
} =
"VALUE"
;
&$coderef
(1,2,3);
print
$globref
"output\n"
;
It's important to understand that we are specifically I<not> dereferencing
C<
$arrayref
[0]> or C<
$hashref
{
"KEY"
}> there. The dereference of the
scalar
variable happens I<
before
> it does any key lookups. Anything more
complicated than a simple
scalar
variable must
use
methods 2 or 3 below.
However, a
"simple scalar"
includes an identifier that itself uses method
1 recursively. Therefore, the following prints
"howdy"
.
$refrefref
= \\\
"howdy"
;
print
$$
$$refrefref
;
=head3 Block
Anywhere you'd put an identifier (or chain of identifiers) as part of a
variable or subroutine name, you can replace the identifier
with
a
BLOCK returning a reference of the correct type. In other words, the
previous examples could be written like this:
$bar
= ${
$scalarref
};
push
(@{
$arrayref
},
$filename
);
${
$arrayref
}[0] =
"January"
;
${
$hashref
}{
"KEY"
} =
"VALUE"
;
&{
$coderef
}(1,2,3);
$globref
->
print
(
"output\n"
);
Admittedly, it's a little silly to
use
the curlies in this case, but
the BLOCK can contain any arbitrary expression, in particular,
subscripted expressions:
&{
$dispatch
{
$index
} }(1,2,3);
Because of being able to omit the curlies
for
the simple case of C<
$$x
>,
people often make the mistake of viewing the dereferencing symbols as
proper operators, and wonder about their precedence. If they were,
though, you could
use
parentheses instead of braces. That's not the case.
Consider the difference below; case 0 is a short-hand version of case 1,
I<not> case 2:
$$hashref
{
"KEY"
} =
"VALUE"
;
${
$hashref
}{
"KEY"
} =
"VALUE"
;
${
$hashref
{
"KEY"
}} =
"VALUE"
;
${
$hashref
->{
"KEY"
}} =
"VALUE"
;
Case 2 is also deceptive in that you're accessing a variable
called
%hashref
, not dereferencing through
$hashref
to the hash
it's presumably referencing. That would be case 3.
=head3 Arrow Notation
Subroutine calls and lookups of individual array elements arise often
enough that it gets cumbersome to
use
method 2. As a form of
syntactic sugar, the examples
for
method 2 may be written:
$arrayref
->[0] =
"January"
;
$hashref
->{
"KEY"
} =
"VALUE"
;
$coderef
->(1,2,3);
The left side of the arrow can be any expression returning a reference,
including a previous dereference. Note that C<
$array
[
$x
]> is I<not> the
same thing as C<<
$array
->[
$x
] >> here:
$array
[
$x
]->{
"foo"
}->[0] =
"January"
;
This is one of the cases we mentioned earlier in which references could
spring into existence
when
in an lvalue context. Before this
statement, C<
$array
[
$x
]> may have been undefined. If so, it's
automatically
defined
with
a hash reference so that we can look up
C<{
"foo"
}> in it. Likewise C<<
$array
[
$x
]->{
"foo"
} >> will automatically get
defined
with
an array reference so that we can look up C<[0]> in it.
This process is called I<autovivification>.
One more thing here. The arrow is optional I<between> brackets
subscripts, so you can shrink the above down to
$array
[
$x
]{
"foo"
}[0] =
"January"
;
Which, in the degenerate case of using only ordinary arrays, gives you
multidimensional arrays just like C's:
$score
[
$x
][
$y
][
$z
] += 42;
Well, okay, not entirely like C
's arrays, actually. C doesn'
t know how
to grow its arrays on demand. Perl does.
=head3 Objects
If a reference happens to be a reference to an object, then there are
probably methods to access the things referred to, and you should probably
stick to those methods
unless
you're in the class
package
that defines the
object
's methods. In other words, be nice, and don'
t violate the object's
encapsulation without a very good reason. Perl does not enforce
encapsulation. We are not totalitarians here. We
do
expect some basic
civility though.
=head3 Miscellaneous Usage
Using a string or number as a reference produces a symbolic reference,
as explained above. Using a reference as a number produces an
integer representing its storage location in memory. The only
useful thing to be done
with
this is to compare two references
numerically to see whether they refer to the same location.
X<reference, numeric context>
if
(
$ref1
==
$ref2
) {
print
"refs 1 and 2 refer to the same thing\n"
;
}
Using a reference as a string produces both its referent's type,
including any
package
blessing as described in L<perlobj>, as well
as the numeric address expressed in
hex
. The
ref
() operator returns
just the type of thing the reference is pointing to, without the
address. See L<perlfunc/
ref
>
for
details and examples of its
use
.
X<reference, string context>
The
bless
() operator may be used to associate the object a reference
points to
with
a
package
functioning as an object class. See L<perlobj>.
A typeglob may be dereferenced the same way a reference can, because
the dereference syntax always indicates the type of reference desired.
So C<${
*foo
}> and C<${\
$foo
}> both indicate the same
scalar
variable.
Here's a trick
for
interpolating a subroutine call into a string:
print
"My sub returned @{[mysub(1,2,3)]} that time.\n"
;
The way it works is that
when
the C<@{...}> is seen in the double-quoted
string, it's evaluated as a block. The block creates a reference to an
anonymous array containing the results of the call to C<mysub(1,2,3)>. So
the whole block returns a reference to an array, which is then
dereferenced by C<@{...}> and stuck into the double-quoted string. This
chicanery is also useful
for
arbitrary expressions:
print
"That yields @{[$n + 5]} widgets\n"
;
Similarly, an expression that returns a reference to a
scalar
can be
dereferenced via C<${...}>. Thus, the above expression may be written
as:
print
"That yields ${\($n + 5)} widgets\n"
;
=head2 Circular References
X<circular reference> X<reference, circular>
It is possible to create a
"circular reference"
in Perl, which can lead
to memory leaks. A circular reference occurs
when
two references
contain a reference to
each
other, like this:
my
$foo
= {};
my
$bar
= {
foo
=>
$foo
};
$foo
->{bar} =
$bar
;
You can also create a circular reference
with
a single variable:
my
$foo
;
$foo
= \
$foo
;
In this case, the reference count
for
the variables will never reach 0,
and the references will never be garbage-collected. This can lead to
memory leaks.
Because objects in Perl are implemented as references, it's possible to
have circular references
with
objects as well. Imagine a TreeNode class
where
each
node references its parent and child nodes. Any node
with
a
parent will be part of a circular reference.
You can break circular references by creating a
"weak reference"
. A
weak reference does not increment the reference count
for
a variable,
which means that the object can go out of scope and be destroyed. You
can weaken a reference
with
the C<weaken> function exported by the
L<Scalar::Util> module, or available as C<builtin::weaken> directly in
Perl version 5.35.7 or later.
Here's how we can make the first example safer:
my
$foo
= {};
my
$bar
= {
foo
=>
$foo
};
$foo
->{bar} =
$bar
;
weaken
$foo
->{bar};
The reference from C<
$foo
> to C<
$bar
>
has
been weakened. When the
C<
$bar
> variable goes out of scope, it will be garbage-collected. The
next
time
you look at the value of the C<<
$foo
->{bar} >> key, it will
be C<
undef
>.
This action at a distance can be confusing, so you should be careful
with
your
use
of weaken. You should weaken the reference in the
variable that will go out of scope I<first>. That way, the longer-lived
variable will contain the expected reference
until
it goes out of
scope.
=head2 Symbolic references
X<reference, symbolic> X<reference, soft>
X<symbolic reference> X<soft reference>
We said that references spring into existence as necessary
if
they are
undefined, but we didn't
say
what happens
if
a value used as a
reference is already
defined
, but I<isn't> a hard reference. If you
use
it as a reference, it'll be treated as a symbolic
reference. That is, the value of the
scalar
is taken to be the I<name>
of a variable, rather than a direct
link
to a (possibly) anonymous
value.
People frequently expect it to work like this. So it does.
$name
=
"foo"
;
$$name
= 1;
${
$name
} = 2;
${
$name
x 2} = 3;
$name
->[0] = 4;
@$name
= ();
&$name
();
$pack
=
"THAT"
;
${
"${pack}::$name"
} = 5;
This is powerful, and slightly dangerous, in that it's possible
to intend (
with
the utmost sincerity) to
use
a hard reference, and
accidentally
use
a symbolic reference instead. To protect against
that, you can
say
and then only hard references will be allowed
for
the rest of the enclosing
block. An inner block may countermand that
with
no
strict
'refs'
;
Only
package
variables (globals, even
if
localized) are visible to
symbolic references. Lexical variables (declared
with
my
()) aren't in
a symbol table, and thus are invisible to this mechanism. For example:
local
$value
= 10;
$ref
=
"value"
;
{
my
$value
= 20;
print
$$ref
;
}
This will still
print
10, not 20. Remember that
local
() affects
package
variables, which are all
"global"
to the
package
.
=head2 Not-so-symbolic references
Brackets
around
a symbolic reference can simply
serve to isolate an identifier or variable name from the rest of an
expression, just as they always have within a string. For example,
$push
=
"pop on "
;
print
"${push}over"
;
has
always meant to
print
"pop on over"
, even though
push
is
a reserved word. This is generalized to work the same
without the enclosing double quotes, so that
print
${
push
} .
"over"
;
and even
print
${
push
} .
"over"
;
will have the same effect. This
construct is I<not> considered to be a symbolic reference
when
you're
using strict refs:
${ bareword };
${
"bareword"
};
Similarly, because of all the subscripting that is done using single words,
the same rule applies to any bareword that is used
for
subscripting a hash.
So now, instead of writing
$hash
{
"aaa"
}{
"bbb"
}{
"ccc"
}
you can
write
just
$hash
{ aaa }{ bbb }{ ccc }
and not worry about whether the subscripts are reserved words. In the
rare event that you
do
wish to
do
something like
$hash
{
shift
}
you can force interpretation as a reserved word by adding anything that
makes it more than a bareword:
$hash
{
shift
() }
$hash
{ +
shift
}
$hash
{
shift
@_
}
The C<
use
warnings> pragma or the B<-w> switch will
warn
you
if
it
interprets a reserved word as a string.
But it will
no
longer
warn
you about using lowercase words, because the
string is effectively quoted.
=head2 Pseudo-hashes: Using an array as a hash
X<pseudo-hash> X<pseudo hash> X<pseudohash>
Pseudo-hashes have been removed from Perl. The
'fields'
pragma
remains available.
=head2 Function Templates
X<scope, lexical> X<closure> X<lexical> X<lexical scope>
X<subroutine, nested> X<
sub
, nested> X<subroutine,
local
> X<
sub
,
local
>
As explained above, an anonymous function
with
access to the lexical
variables visible
when
that function was compiled, creates a closure. It
retains access to those variables even though it doesn't get run
until
later, such as in a signal handler or a Tk callback.
Using a closure as a function template allows us to generate many functions
that act similarly. Suppose you wanted functions named
after
the colors
that generated HTML font changes
for
the various colors:
print
"Be "
, red(
"careful"
),
"with that "
, green(
"light"
);
The red() and green() functions would be similar. To create these,
we
'll assign a closure to a typeglob of the name of the function we'
re
trying to build.
@colors
=
qw(red blue green yellow orange purple violet)
;
for
my
$name
(
@colors
) {
no
strict
'refs'
;
*$name
= *{
uc
$name
} =
sub
{
"<FONT COLOR='$name'>@_</FONT>"
};
}
Now all those different functions appear to exist independently. You can
call red(), RED(), blue(), BLUE(), green(), etc. This technique saves on
both compile
time
and memory
use
, and is less error-prone as well, since
syntax checks happen at compile
time
. It's critical that any variables in
the anonymous subroutine be lexicals in order to create a proper closure.
That's the reasons
for
the C<
my
> on the loop iteration variable.
This is one of the only places where giving a
prototype
to a closure makes
much sense. If you wanted to impose
scalar
context on the arguments of
these functions (probably not a wise idea
for
this particular example),
you could have written it this way instead:
*$name
=
sub
($) {
"<FONT COLOR='$name'>$_[0]</FONT>"
};
However, since
prototype
checking happens at compile
time
, the assignment
above happens too late to be of much
use
. You could address this by
putting the whole loop of assignments within a BEGIN block, forcing it
to occur during compilation.
Access to lexicals that change over
time
--like those in the C<
for
> loop
above, basically aliases to elements from the surrounding lexical scopes--
only works
with
anonymous subs, not
with
named subroutines. Generally
said, named subroutines
do
not nest properly and should only be declared
in the main
package
scope.
This is because named subroutines are created at compile
time
so their
lexical variables get assigned to the parent lexicals from the first
execution of the parent block. If a parent scope is entered a second
time
, its lexicals are created again,
while
the nested subs still
reference the old ones.
Anonymous subroutines get to capture
each
time
you execute the C<
sub
>
operator, as they are created on the fly. If you are accustomed to using
nested subroutines in other programming languages
with
their own private
variables, you'll have to work at it a bit in Perl. The intuitive coding
of this type of thing incurs mysterious warnings about "will not stay
shared" due to the reasons explained above.
For example, this won't work:
sub
outer {
my
$x
=
$_
[0] + 35;
sub
inner {
return
$x
* 19 }
return
$x
+ inner();
}
A work-
around
is the following:
sub
outer {
my
$x
=
$_
[0] + 35;
local
*inner
=
sub
{
return
$x
* 19 };
return
$x
+ inner();
}
Now inner() can only be called from within outer(), because of the
temporary assignments of the anonymous subroutine. But
when
it does,
it
has
normal access to the lexical variable
$x
from the scope of
outer() at the
time
outer is invoked.
This
has
the interesting effect of creating a function
local
to another
function, something not normally supported in Perl.
=head2 Postfix Dereference Syntax
Beginning in v5.20.0, a postfix syntax
for
using references is
available. It behaves as described in L</Using References>, but instead
of a prefixed sigil, a postfixed sigil-and-star is used.
For example:
$r
= \
@a
;
@b
=
$r
->@*;
$r
= [ 1, [ 2, 3 ], 4 ];
$r
->[1]->@*;
In Perl 5.20 and 5.22, this syntax must be enabled
with
C<
use
feature
'postderef'
>. As of Perl 5.24,
no
feature declarations are required to make
it available.
Postfix dereference should work in all circumstances where block
(circumfix) dereference worked, and should be entirely equivalent. This
syntax allows dereferencing to be written and
read
entirely
left-to-right. The following equivalencies are
defined
:
$sref
->$*;
$aref
->@*;
$aref
->$
$href
->%*;
$cref
->&*;
$gref
->**;
Note especially that C<<
$cref
->&* >> is I<not> equivalent to C<<
$cref
->() >>, and can serve different purposes.
Glob elements can be extracted through the postfix dereferencing feature:
$gref
->*{SCALAR};
Postfix array and
scalar
dereferencing I<can> be used in interpolating
strings (double quotes or the C<
qq> operator), but only if the
C&
lt;postderef_qq> feature is enabled. Interpolation of postfix array highest
index
access (C<< ->$
enabled.
=head2 Postfix Reference Slicing
Value slices of arrays and hashes may also be taken
with
postfix
dereferencing notation,
with
the following equivalencies:
$aref
->@[ ... ];
$href
->@{ ... };
Postfix key/value pair slicing, added in 5.20.0 and documented in
L<the KeyE<sol>Value Hash Slices section of perldata|perldata/"Key/Value Hash
Slices">, also behaves as expected:
$aref
->%[ ... ];
$href
->%{ ... };
As
with
postfix array, postfix value slice dereferencing I<can> be used
in interpolating strings (double quotes or the C<
qq> operator), but only
if the C&
lt;postderef_qq> L<feature> is enabled.
=head2 Assigning to References
Beginning in v5.22.0, the referencing operator can be assigned to. It
performs an aliasing operation, so that the variable name referenced on the
left-hand side becomes an alias
for
the thing referenced on the right-hand
side:
\
$x
= \
$y
;
\
&foo
= \
&bar
;
This syntax must be enabled
with
C<
use
feature
'refaliasing'
>. It is
experimental, and will
warn
by
default
unless
C<
no
warnings
'experimental::refaliasing'
> is in effect.
These forms may be assigned to, and cause the right-hand side to be
evaluated in
scalar
context:
\
$scalar
\
@array
\
%hash
\
&sub
\
my
$scalar
\
my
@array
\
my
%hash
\state
$scalar
\
our
$scalar
\
local
$scalar
\
local
our
$scalar
\
$some_array
[
$index
]
\
$some_hash
{
$key
}
\
local
$some_array
[
$index
]
\
local
$some_hash
{
$key
}
condition ? \
$this
: \
$that
[0]
Slicing operations and parentheses cause
the right-hand side to be evaluated in
list context:
\
@array
[5..7]
(\
@array
[5..7])
\(
@array
[5..7])
\
@hash
{
'foo'
,
'bar'
}
(\
@hash
{
'foo'
,
'bar'
})
\(
@hash
{
'foo'
,
'bar'
})
(\
$scalar
)
\(
$scalar
)
\(
my
$scalar
)
\
my
(
$scalar
)
(\
@array
)
(\
%hash
)
(\
&sub
)
\(
&sub
)
\(
$foo
,
@bar
,
%baz
)
(\
$foo
, \
@bar
, \
%baz
)
Each element on the right-hand side must be a reference to a datum of the
right type. Parentheses immediately surrounding an array (and possibly
also C<
my
>/C<state>/C<
our
>/C<
local
>) will make
each
element of the array an
alias to the corresponding
scalar
referenced on the right-hand side:
\(
@x
) = \(
@y
);
\
my
(
@x
) = \(
@y
);
\(
my
@x
) = \(
@y
);
push
@x
, 3;
\(
@x
) = (\
$x
, \
$y
, \
$z
);
Combining that form
with
C<
local
> and putting parentheses immediately
around
a hash are forbidden (because it is not clear what they should
do
):
\
local
(
@array
) = foo();
\(
%hash
) = bar();
Assignment to references and non-references may be combined in lists and
conditional ternary expressions, as long as the
values
on the right-hand
side are the right type
for
each
element on the left, though this may make
for
obfuscated code:
(
my
$tom
, \
my
$dick
, \
my
@harry
) = (\1, \2, [1..3]);
my
$type
=
ref
$thingy
;
(
$type
?
$type
eq
'ARRAY'
? \
@foo
: \
$bar
:
$baz
) =
$thingy
;
A reference assignment in list context returns a list of references to
each
left-hand value. So
for
example
@b
= ((\
$l1
, \
$l2
, \(
@a
)) = (\
$r1
, \
$r2
, $\r3, \$4));
is equivalent to
(\
$l1
, \
$l2
, \(
@a
)) = (\
$r1
, \
$r2
, $\r3, \$4);
@b
= (\
$l1
, \
$l2
, \
$a
[0], \
$a
[1]);
The C<
foreach
> loop can also take a reference constructor
for
its loop
variable, though the syntax is limited to one of the following,
with
an
optional C<
my
>, C<state>, or C<
our
>
after
the backslash:
\
$s
\
@a
\
%h
\
&c
No parentheses are permitted. This feature is particularly useful
for
arrays-of-arrays, or arrays-of-hashes:
foreach
\
my
@a
(
@array_of_arrays
) {
frobnicate(
$a
[0],
$a
[-1]);
}
foreach
\
my
%h
(
@array_of_hashes
) {
$h
{gelastic}++
if
$h
{type} eq
'funny'
;
}
B<CAVEAT:> Aliasing does not work correctly
with
closures. If you
try
to
alias lexical variables from an inner subroutine or C<
eval
>, the aliasing
will only be visible within that inner
sub
, and will not affect the outer
subroutine where the variables are declared. This bizarre behavior is
subject to change.
=head2 Declaring a Reference to a Variable
Beginning in v5.26.0, the referencing operator can come
after
C<
my
>,
C<state>, C<
our
>, or C<
local
>. This syntax must be enabled
with
C<
use
feature
'declared_refs'
>. It is experimental, and will
warn
by
default
unless
C<
no
warnings
'experimental::refaliasing'
> is in effect.
This feature makes these:
my
\
$x
;
our
\
$y
;
equivalent to:
\
my
$x
;
\
our
$x
;
It is intended mainly
for
use
in assignments to references (see
L</Assigning to References>, above). It also allows the backslash to be
used on just some items in a list of declared variables:
my
(
$foo
, \
@bar
, \
%baz
);
X<reference, string context> X<reference,
use
as hash key>
You may not (usefully)
use
a reference as the key to a hash. It will be
converted into a string:
$x
{ \
$x
} =
$x
;
If you
try
to dereference the key, it won't
do
a hard dereference, and
you won
't accomplish what you'
re attempting. You might want to
do
something
more like
$r
= \
@a
;
$x
{
$r
} =
$r
;
And then at least you can
use
the
values
(), which will be
real refs, instead of the
keys
(), which won't.
The standard Tie::RefHash module provides a convenient workaround to this.
=head1 SEE ALSO
Besides the obvious documents, source code can be instructive.
Some pathological examples of the
use
of references can be found
in the F<t/op/
ref
.t> regression test in the Perl source directory.
See also L<perldsc> and L<perllol>
for
how to
use
references to create
complex data structures, and L<perlootut> and L<perlobj>
for
how to
use
them to create objects.